I really hate it when that happens.
I do a blog post on boobs, and the next day there is a newspaper article on a very similar topic that kinda contradicts what I’m saying.
This particular arcticle, a teensy one by Evonne Barry of the Melbourne Herald Sun pretty much states that:
The sexualisation of women’s bodies has turned a generation off public breastfeeding, according to a maternity report.
The Newspoll survey found 36 percent of poeople aged 18-24 believe breastfeeding is “unacceptable” in the workplace and in cafes, compared with 27% of all adults surveyed.
I do think it is very sad that this exists, and that so many people think like this. I do stand by my argument, however, that women’s bodies, and breasts, are sexual by their very nature.
And the angle I hadn’t considered was the angle that women would find it uncomfortable breastfeeding because boobs have been sexualised. Considering my own thoughts and feelings (and yes, they are mine and mine alone) I guess I don’t like people looking at my boobs when I’m feeding coz it does make me feel a little bit icky. I feel this because they are a sensual part of my body, and, I feel, quite private. Not sure if I’ve explained that terribly well at all!
Anyhoo, if boobs weren’t sexual or sensual in the first place, I don’t believe the issue would be as huge as it is. I don’t believe boobs would be sexualised in the manner that they are if they weren’t sexual or sensual. In which case, it would be a moot point, breasts wouldn’t be sexualised and no one would be able to blame the media for anything. Or for this, anyway.
*sigh*
If only it were all that simple. I really wish we could all just accept and live with both.
As I said in the last boobie post – breasts, like women, are multitasking and multifunctional. Why are we not applauding this diversity of the boob? I know I am.
(Any excuse for a celebratory bubbles, really
)
The debate rages in and out – control cry or not. Depending, of course, on which version of controlled crying they decide to tell you about.
Anyhoo, 8 years ago, and even 6 years ago, controlled crying was in. And now, it’s something else. I don’t even know what’s trendy anymore because it’s all too bloody confusing and keeps changing and no one really cares what suits the mum or the baby or the family. They’re all sprouting their own guff.
Couple of weeks back was some research that said leaving baby to cry for 20 minutes was ok. And the current-trend followers are doing their oh, so empowering and supportive thing and saying “oh, no, do you know what you’re putting your baby through when you leave it to cry?” and the “how can you do that’s?” etc.
(In case you missed it, I was being a little sarcy with the “oh, so empowering and supportive” comment)
You know what?
I. Don’t. Care.
I don’t care how high the stress hormone levels in the baby go after crying for 20 minuutes. Or how distressed he gets when he cries and doesn’t get an immediate response.
Ka-ching. Ka-ching.
Whoops, that was Mother Guilt levels rising.
After 10 months of 2am wake ups and 1 sleep a day, what the fuck do you think my stress levels are doing?
Ka-ching. Add some more to my stress hormone levels with the increase in Mother Guilt levels.
Ka-ching is not quite right, impies cashing up. Sadly, sleep deprived, befuddled brain can’t think of anything else.
When my lack of sleep, and currently ignored bouts of crying lasting longer than 20 minutes, starts to impact on my daily life, the baby’s stress hormone levels are the least of my worries. Sending the kids off to school with sandwiches made of their recent school report and a smelly sock, which have somehow managed to relocate themselves to the fridge’s cheese compartment and Vegemite jar respectively and ka-ching, ka-ching, ka-ching – there go my stress hormone levels again.
Followed closely by the Mother Guilt levels, yet again, when I realise I’ve yelled at one of them for complaining about what he was wearing to school, then realise I’d not only made him cry, but sent him off in a sparkly pink tu-tu. And we don’t have girls in this house. Or sparkly pink tu-tus for that matter.
Worse, my stress hormone levels are so high, I can’t function enough to get the components of a MUG of coffee working – you know, hot water and coffee. I even have a machine to do it for me, a machine that literally requires me to add water from the tap, and add coffee beans. It does the rest … and I can’t manage to get that right some days.
Ka-ching. Ka-ching. Ka-ching. Ka-ching. That would be my levels of self-worth declining, whilst my feelings of inadequacy and crap mothering increase exponentially!
The Psycho Bitch that has moved into our house – via my head – who yells at everyone and can’t even get a decent MUG of coffee isn’t helping matters, either.
So, with all the well-meaning and well intended advice out there advising us on the best ways to get babies to sleep etc etc blah blah blah, throwing in all the guff about their stress hormone levels with being left to cry, with all due respect … not very fucking helpful.
At all.
Ka-ching. Ka-ching. Ka-ching. Ka-ching. Ka-ching. Ka-ching. Ka-ching. Ka-ching.Ka-ching. Ka-ching. Ka-ching. Ka-ching.
That’s my stress hormone levels, my Mother Guilt levels, my feelings of inadequacy, my feelings of worthlessness and my feeling like a “bad mother”. Increasing. Rapidly.
All of which go up even more rapidly when you’re sleep deprived and feeling stressed, guilty and inadequate and the baby has been left to cry for something in the vacinity of 37 seconds. Baby’s hormone levels, stress or otherwise, are not top priority.
Thank you for your well-meaning ‘advice’. Now, please shut up.
Unless of course, you’re going to focus on me – yes, as selfish as that may sound, um, if I get hit by a bus because I can’t function enough to walk, I seriously doubt the 10 month old is going to manage the household and make sandwiches for lunch. Although, given my current state, he cold probably do a better job than I can.
So, right now, if I hear one more “expert” say “oh, but think of what you’re doing to the baby” I will quite possibly go slightly more mad than I already am. Surely, my overall mental and emotional well-being are going to have greater impact on the long term development of the baby than being left to cry for a bit?
Or is that me just being a selfish cow, as some have implied and yet others have outright stated?
And thank you to the Pycho Bitch who helped me to write this. Your (my?) input was invaluable.
I am a breastfeeding Mum. Third time around.
I’m not proud of it.
I’m not not proud of it either.
I just am.
I am also, however, sometimes … embarrassed … ashamed … to be a part of this group.
You see, I was recently part of a discussion with a group of mums with similar interests. I.e. breastfeeding our babies. I use the term ‘discussion’ loosely. It was more someone had a vent about something someone said to them when they were breastfeeding publicly, and everyone jumped in and told their own story (mostly without reading anythign anyone else said).
Whilst I am a very strong advocate for breastfeeding, and think all women deserve the right to choose to breastfeed (or not), in public and without any fear of discrimiation, prejudice or comment from passsers-by, the self-righteousness of some from this group astounded me.
Like it or not, there a people around us who also have very strong beliefs about breastfeeding. Especially breastfeeding in public. It may be religious or cultural beliefs. We have a massive cohort from a particular generation who were brought up on the very belief – rightly or wrongly – that breastfeeding was not ok. That women feeding in public were wanton trollops with no morals. Or whatever.
I’m not debating whether this is right or wrong – just that it is. It’s that people have very strong views about breastfeeding in public; both for and against the practice. I find it extremely hypocritical that some women can stand there and demand respect to feed in public, yet at the same time, totally disrespect that other people have thoughts, feelings, beliefs and values, too.
Sadly, this ‘discussion’ went to the point of suggesting that a kind man, who offered the use of a private room with comfortable chairs for a breastfeeding mother, was “whisking her away so she wouldn’t upset others”, and that feeding rooms were designed to remove breastfeeding mothers from the public eye so as not to offend. Women who choose to hide themselves away are doing the advocacy for the right to breastfeed in public a disservice, perhaps?
That some people do find breastfeeding Mums discomforting or offensive, and that some mums do prefer the quiet and comfort of feeding rooms for numerous reasons is quite beside the point for these women.
I don’t think breastfeeding in public is really the issue here. We have laws that prevent discrimination of this practice, and a media contingent that will jump on any bandwagon where any breastfeeding mother has been slightly wronged. Even if the article makes no sense what-s0-ever or is completely ridiculous. Breastfeeding in public is acceptable in our society, and certainly by a majority of our citizens.
No, the issue is something completely different. Well, there are two issues, really.
The first is that there are a number of people out there who think it is totally acceptable to comment to a breastfeeding woman. And not just any comment either. Particularly nasty comments, at times. People are more polite to someone who lights up a cigarette beside them (“Do you mind blowing that smoke the other way, please?”) than they are to a woman feeding her child. Why anyone thinks it’s ok to do this is beyond me; to speak to anyone in such a manner, for any reason, is just totally unacceptable.
Secondly, why is it that soooo many Mums are, quite frankly, paranoid when they are feeding bubs in public? Why is it that anyone looking at them is “glaring in distaste”? Or two people chatting as they walk by are obviously in disbelief . “Did you see that? She’s breastfeeding! And in public!”
Unless anyone actually comments directly about the feeding, why assume that it’s the problem? Maybe they don’t like what you’re wearing. Or your hair. Maybe you got them on a bad day. Hey, how’s this for a thought … readical as it may seem … maybe it has nothing to do with you at all!
Why is it that a kind man can offer a quiet, comfortable place without being accused of doing the wrong thing? Personally, I would – and have – thank him for thinking of me.
The issue isn’t breastfeeding in public. It’s the lack of respect we, as a society, have for others. And, sometimes, the lack of confidence we have in ourselves and our beliefs.
Yesterday, the Barnardos Mother of the Year was announced.
A deserving Mother of 5, foster mum and all round busy mother, Pamela Deacon.
Some of her kids have special needs, she’s organising social groups for severely disabled young adults and is just amazing!
I can’t help but feel a little inadquate in her presence … even if that presence is a gorgeous pic in today’s Herald Sun (can’t find a link on their site to show you)
I do wonder, in all her fabulousness, if she’s ever spent 5 hours finding her runners, which she had on her feet the whole time, or located her sunglasses in the egg compartment in the fridge? Has she ever slipped up and been “normal”?
Did she run for the camera when her child had his head stuck under the coffee table, or did she jump to rescue him?
Luckily, there’s an Award for normal and real mums like us – the Real Mum of the Year Award
Nominations close in 10 days.
Have you Nominated a Real Mum today?
With the recent article, featuring yours truly, in last Sunday’s Age I recieved numerous emails and noted discussion on various social wesbites, forums and the like.
Amongst the “thank you” emails and other, I was diagnosed with an “attachment disorder” – formally of course, based entirely on the readers interpretation of the article - and concern that I’d missed the experience of breastfeeding.
(Where the hell did that come from? Because I subscribe to the method of Controlled Crying? Can I not do both??!!)
Anyhoo, it was then that I noticed something very disturbing and incredibly upsetting.
You see, I don’t work in extremes. I work in ‘mainstream’ (for want of a better word), what the majority do, the average, the usual.
The accusations regarding my controlled crying (CC) beliefs were founded on the extreme, fanatical and, I believe, potentially harmful versions of CC that have been doing the rounds for years. The original having be misinterpreted, misconstrued, and altered to become something that most of us CCers don’t subscribe to.
The disturbing, upsetting thing is that, in my various forays into discussions of various groups (in this case alternative parenting advocates) I noted that “research” (incredibly biased), videos, documents and other images were doing the rounds within the groups.
Disturbing, emotional images that demonstrate only the extreme cases of the parenting style in question.
In the hands of experts and those in the know, this is useful information to have. My concern is that, in the hands of the “followers”, those who passionately follow a particular style, but have no formal experience or education in supporting Mums, this is a damaging practice. It does nothing but reinforce (extreme) stereotypes and generalisations, causing the extreme behaviours to appear to be the norm, perpetuating the divides between Mums who subscribe to parenting styles.
Thus, when I say I subscribe to CC, I’m condemned, attacked and vilified. And I don’t know why. Or didn’t, until I saw what was going on.
Now I understand the passionate comments, which are, sadly, founded on behaviours that are outside the norm.
This isn’t just the alternative parenting subscribers, baby-wearers, co-sleepers, exacerbating the divide either.
I’ve seen the responses my baby-wearing friends (yes, I do have friends who wear their babies. In fact, I went out for lunch with one yesterday) have received after media airings of alternative parenting.
The abuse and comments they receive, the emails doing the rounds about how ‘damaging’ it is, and the videos and images depicting those behaviours at the extreme other end of the scale.
I wonder at the pereceived need to participate in such activity. Is it a case of “if I put down others, I’ll feel better about what I do”? Sometimes, it smacks of that.
Are people doing it to justify their own behaviours and convince themselves?
Do Mums feel as though they are being attacked, and therefore defend to the hilt, using the most damaging and emotive weapons they have?
Whatever the reason, if there even is a reason, it does nothing to support Mums. It adds to the pressures and feelings of inadequacy that many Mums feel. Confusion, feelings of failure and stress increase, and the great divide gets bigger, more passionate and more and more damaging.
Sadly, I think parenting practices are becoming like religion and politics – don’t discuss them over dinner!
Even more sadly, we are losing substantial support from those around us who could support us, because the minds of Mums (and Dads) are being warped by controversial practices being made public, and the gentler, practical, doable and average practices are becoming invisible.
With the series currently showing on the ABC – Bringing Up Baby which revisits parenting styles from half a century ago, and follows several sets of parentings each following a particular style – comes the Great Parenting Debate.
Or several Great Parenting Debates. An article in the Sunday Age this morning, Crying Out Loud: mothercraft theories clash touches on these parenting styles, and the Great Parenting Debates.
(And they’ve used a very, very delicious baby in their photo!)
Happy to have put my two cents worth in, I maintain the ‘each to their own’ philosophy and encourage people to do what is right for them.
(For the record, I don’t “resent” the baby-wearers, what I resent is being told I’m a bad mum because I don’t. If it works for you, who am I to tell you to do differently?!)
Sure, I subscribe to the controlled crying (in its real form, not the neglectful, leave a child alone in its cot for a week with no human contact, to teach it a lesson version the some anti-control-criers have made it out to be) and non-baby wearing generation. Because it suits me, and works for me and my family.
But I’m so sick of being labelled “abusive” because I let my child cry for 30 seconds whilst I’m attempting to use the toilet, or I’m off removing the head of a Lego man.
(That was at the request of my 8 year old, not because I was really stressed and venting my frustrations on poor defenseless Lego men!)
Or, because I really want him to sleep and doing what I can to get him to sleep and maintain my sanity.
As someone who, at various times in my life, has experienced physical, emotional and verbal abuse, I really, really object to comments like:
“…but how do you tell parents who have used controlled crying for so long that this is a form of abuse now?”
made be Annmarie Samson of Night Nannies.
Leaving my child to cry for a minute, two, until I can tell he really needs me, is very, very different from forms of abuse. Although touted as akin to neglect, it is far from it.
Telling mothers they are abusing their children, badgering them to confirm to your ways (whatever the way) is bullying and a form of abuse in itself. It’s psychological abuse.
Sadly, children are more likely to be the victims of physical abuse by their overtired, overstressed mothers who feel awful because they are being told to attend their crying babies, when the best thing they can do is step away until they can deal with it.
Guilting mother’s into behaving a certain way undermines their own instincts and abilities. Mother’s are amazing people with the ability to know what is right for their children. Sometimes they need guidance. Sometimes, they need to step away from a crying child (or any child for that matter) for the safety of everyone.
I appreciate everyone has their own view on parenting. Most views are based on people’s own experiences and what has worked for them. Most will go with a preanting philosphy that suits their family anyway, only confirming for that family that its the way to go.
I applaud you for finding the way that suits you, and for sticking with it.
But don’t abuse me because I choose a different style.
It appears the Nipple Nazis come in two very different flavours.
There’s the one that many mums with new bubs have experienced; those fanatical advocates of the Breast Is Best Brigade who force the issue of breastfeeding on a mother, whether she wants to or not, at the expense of the mother’s thoughts, feelings, beliefs or desires.
(I do not refer to those who support and encourage Mums to breast feed, nor to lactation consultants or similar as a group – just those individuals whom push the issue of breastfeeding without considering Mum! It’s really annoying!)
It now appears that, at the other end of the scale, it’s Facebook !
No, they’re not getting on the bandwagon and shoving boobs down babies throats! They’ve gone on a Nipple Banning Rampage!
No Nips for Facebook.
I was astounded to read the news reports; Facebook are removing pictures of women breastfeeding, based on a ‘no nipple’ rule. Apparently, it’s ‘obscene’!
Fairy nuff they’re working on keeping the site ‘clean’ and family friendly, and I could go on a whole rant about other images exposed on the very same site. But I won’t. Mostly because I’m sure bazillions of others have done a very similar rant.
But I do gotta add – it’s a HUGE suprise that we haven’t seen the heads of millions of Mums worldwide explode!
Not with anger (although that, too). But just another of those situations where we have, on the one shoulder, the messages re the benefits of breastfeeding and why we “should” be doing it, complete with inbuilt Guilt Trips and the like, and on the other, the message that bresatfeeding is “obscene”.
We’ve all heard of, or read the articles, women who have been asked to leave restaurants and the like for feeding boob-style, yet when we fall into a sobbing heap for the lack of social support and ring the helplines, we’re encouraged to continue the fabulous job we’re doing. After all, it is best for baby, they tell us.
Argh!
All power to the fabulous women (and men) who are protesting against this fervent message that women who breastfeed is somewhat akin to an illegally obtained and very private Paris Hilton video (probably still doing the rounds via email).
Of course, when you’re protesting against a 23 year old male billionaire, I’d say you got your work cut out for you. After all, the Paris Hilton clip is probably part of his private collection, and watched on a regular basis. Such is the nature of 23 year old males.
Besides which … you said ‘boobies’ – hehehehehehehehe.
Do we really expect someone for whom boobs are part of their entertainment to be completely empathetic to our cause? Or his, undoubtedly equally young and ‘worldly experienced’ administrative team?
Truth be known, they’re peeved because a baby’s head happens to be in the way of their viewing pleasure.
Doing the “good mum” thing the other day and playing with the kids at a playground.
(OK, I was feeding the baby whilst texting some friends, and the older two climbed up things the wrong way, and down other things. The wrong way.)
I noticed a woman wearing a shirt that had, across the back “What’s your superpower?”
My immediate thought was it was one of those shirts advertising something – a new rum mixer or similar.
Curiosity got the better of me (as it is wont to do – damn that Curiosity!) and I did the walk around, sneaky glance thing. The front read “I make milk.”
Thus, I make milk, what’s your superpower.
An initiative of the Australian Breastfeeding Association (aka the ABA).
Cool shirt I thought.
With my background in health, my recent study in health and my two, now three, gorgeous boys, I am an breastfeeding advocate. Besides that, it’s just too damned easy for people like me whose heads are too full and they leave the bottles behind.
(Yep, been there and done that too)
I’m well versed on the benefits of breastfeeding, for the baby and the mum. In oh, so many ways! We’ve all had it rammed down our throats, so there’s no need for me to repeat all the research and World Health Organisation stuff again.
However, I am not an advocate at the expense of the mental health of the mother. I firmly believe the health and development of a baby is just as much, if not more, affected by the emotional and psychological health of a mother than it is by what, or how, it is fed.
(Obviously within reason. There are some things a baby should just not be fed. A diet consisting soley of cow’s milk, for example, is proven to be disasterous. Your top shelf Belgian chocolate is also not a good idea, and just a complete waste of chocolate on someone so unappreciative of such things.)
While I firstly thought the shirt was cool, and I’m sure went a long way to encouraging Mums who may have been teetering between feeding styles, or lacking in confidence about their abilities to breastfeed and persist with it, I did begin to wonder whether it gave some mums, particuarly those who have a really easy time breastfeeding and/or are fanatical about it some sort of perception that they were better than mums who bottle feed.
I also wonder what it does for those women who would dearly love to breastfeed, but for some reason – emotional, psychological or physical – are unable. Do these women, who have successfully carried and birthed a baby, and raised it to whatever age, feel some what Super Inadequate as a result of not being able to “make milk”.
I also wonder about those who choose, for whatever reason, not to breastfeed. Do phrases like this place them into some other “lesser category”? Does it make them rise up and protest (unnecessarily as far as I’m concerned) that they’re doing a great job? Or just add another “Guilt” to their already overflowing list?
Or both?
Frankly, it’s not a “super” power. It’s a perfectly natural response to a whole heap of hormonal and physiological goings on in the body after the birth of a baby. Some women have it better or more than others. Just like some experience PMT more or less than others.
“Making milk” is something that “millions of women all over the world do every day” to use a common phrase that is thrown at numerous mums when they make comment about being scared of childbirth/children or when they cry out for help.
I’m quite sure it’s not the ABAs intention to alienate a whole heap of women, and it was designed to encourage a whole heap of others, comments like these can go a long way to adding to the isolation and inadequacies a lot of Mums already feel.
It’s bad enough we have the 80 year old Italian Grandfather next door telling us what to do, without the experts adding to the confusion.
I’m not a fan of the term Super Mum, nor of Mums being labelled “super” for various Mumming activities – or non-mumming activities that they partake in whilst they are Mums.
What I am a fan of is mums feeling “super” for doing the amazing jobs that they do each and every day, regardless of whether they Make Milk, or whether they make those sandwiches filled will all kinds of vegetable type goodness, then cut into little stars and packed into the lunchbox.
Personally, I’m a Vegemite cut into little triangle person myself. And if you don’t like it, don’t eat it, but there’s nothing else for ya!