Archive for parenting

My first “real” job was with a debt collection agency. I endured day in and day out of listening to people’s hardships and being verbally abused over the phone. My boss was an arse; rude, condescending and nasty. The “human resources manager” had not a humane bone in her body, our breaks were the length of time it took for the kettle to boil, and friendships waned as we were pit against each other. Friday’s after work were spent catching up on anything we could.

At the time I was seeing (and living with) someone who worked in a factory. Lots of standing on feet, hard manual labour, breathing in lordy knows what fumes and particles as he worked. Smoko breaks were relaxed, so long as the orders got done by the time the shift ended, and Friday afternoons was knock off early, for drinks with the boss who shouted first round. Lots of catching up with workmates for bbqs on the weekend.

Regularly, he’d come home and comment how much “harder” his job was than mine. Not a debate I got into after the first two or three arguments, because, really, you couldn’t compare the jobs. Sure, his was physcially more demanding and potentially dangerous, but mentally and emotionally, he was pretty ok. I was stressed to the max, not sleeping and sitting on my bum on the phone all day. I refused to enter the discussion, because I agreed with him on one level – his job was “harder” but on another it wasn’t. It was just too hard to compare the two.

(And probably part of the reason we broke up; that I wouldn’t argue with him, or worse, not agree with him!)

For a long time, I’ve been irked about couples arguing over who has the harder job, the more demanding, the more stressful.

Thus, I was most incensed when I was alerted to one of the latest “post this in your Facebook status” thingies doing the rounds …

I am a cook, a cleaner, a parent, a nanny, a nurse, a handy man, a maid, security, and a comforter x <number of kids>. I don’t get holiday, sick pay, or a day off, I work through the day and some of the night, I am under paid and over worked, now tell me that your job is harder than mine. Repost this if you’re a parent that works hard and is good at what they do : )

Firstly, what angers me is the whole “oooh, what I do is harder/better/more worthwhile/whatever than you”. Which I personally find extremely egotistical, condescending and completely dismisses everything about the other party. But that’s my stuff to deal with.

I’m not debating that some aspects of being a mother aren’t hard. They are extremely demanding at times, extraordinarily stress inducing and the levels of responsibilty are through the roof.

So, too, are those of a brain surgeon. The levels of stress a CEO must endure when faced with the prospect of affecting the livelihood and financial status of thousands of families must be pretty high, too. And the mundanity of stacking shelves in a deserted supermarket in the middle of the night when your iPod is broken is pretty much on a par with the mundanity of motherhood at times, also.

Some could very well argue that wiping Vegemite off a toddler’s face or scraping weetbix off a chair is probably not quite up there with facilitating a multi-billion dollar merger or performing a triple bypass surgery.

I guess, though, at the end of the day/shift, they go home and switch off and it’s not their problem until they clock on again.

Of course, responsibilty and accountability varies from job to job, too. Some have high levels, where they are literally responsible for the lives of another human being (as are mothers) and others just need to make sure the right bill is paid at the right time (as do some mothers), or that the salt and vinegar chips are placed neatly on the shelves and not mixed in with the chicken flavoured ones (some mothers are accountable for things like making sure the mashed potato doesn’t touch the peas).

What no job does is provide the complete and total 24-7 responsibility that parenting does. When your kid breaks his arm in someone else’s care, lets say at school, you are the first person they call. They don’t say “oh, pass that on the Janet  in the office, she’ll deal with it”. Well, they do pass it on to Janet in the office, who rings you. And your response isn’t “Oh, that’s not my job. Bob in accounting is supposed to do that, ring him.”

Usually it’s “oh my god, oh my god, oh my god, I’ll meet you at the hospital” and running around like an idiot and forgetting things.

But is that level of responsibilty as high as that of a neurosurgeon? I don’t know … I’m asking.

If you want to be ‘rewarded’ for dealing with someone screaming at you and throwing a tantrum for not getting them a drink when they asked, throwing up on your shoes and fighting with others under the same roof, go get yourself a job at a pub on King Street on the weekends. They not only give you money, but I’m sure some of your super is covered as well.

Besides, you can go get yourself a nice new pair of shoes or handbag with that sort of reward. A smile from your kid won’t pay your electricity bill, no matter how much it makes you day worthwhile. If you get off on smiles, work as a children’s photographer.

What I’m getting at is that it’s an attempt to compare apples with passionfruit, and I, for one, wouldn’t want to deal with what others do in their job. Although I do like financial reward.

A ”job” by it’s nature and understanding by the masses is:

1. a piece of work, esp. a specific task done as part of the routine of one’s occupation or for an agreed price: She gave him the job of mowing the lawn.

2. a post of employment; full-time or part-time position: She was seeking a job as an editor*

Of course, we do also understand it to be a role or position of responsibility. However, when the word “job” is used in a sentence, our mind usually goes to where someone goes, does the specific tasks required of them, has multiple tea breaks, goes home at the end of the day and gets paid for doing all of that.

Not something we immediatley associate with mothering.

People who volunteer their services, whether for charity, for schools or for services don’t refer to themselves as “having a job”. Mostly, because they are not being paid.

Something we can relate to as a mum.

Personally, I abhor the use of the term “job” in relation to mothering.

Aside from the “not being paid” thing, it completely overlooks the whole 24-seven-ness of the role and the lack of ability to not be responsible, even when the kids are in the care of others.

A mother is something you ‘are’, not something you ‘do’ and putting the term “job” to it significantly undermines that aspect of your being.

Of course, I can’t go past the very fact that making statements like “it’s the hardest job in the world” also undermines those in really hard jobs – whether physcially, emotionally or mentally – and creates yet another unecessary division between those mums who work in paid employment and those who don’t. Not forgetting, also, those who study and those who run their own businesses, or volunteer their time for various bits and pieces.

Motherhood can be hard, and it can be fun. It can contain the most boring moments of your life, and the most stress you’ve ever experienced.

But it’s not a job, and can’t be compared to one, by virtue of what it is.

Quite frankly, as hard as people may argue motherhood to be, I still prefer being woken 3 times a night, going to meetings with snot in my cleavage and dealing with the occasional 2a.m. being vomited on than that first job I ever had. And they paid me!

Categories : Reality Parenting
Comments (4)
Jan
08

“The child should ALWAYS come first”

Posted by: madcow | Comments (3)

It’s something we, as mothers, hear all the time and something a lot of people, particularly childless-but-wanna-be-parents-one-day people, bang on about.

“Children should ALWAYS come first”

Apart from the use of the abhorrent word “should”, I do have issues with this statement (command? Sanctimious high-horsing?)

I’m not actually opposed to the welfare of the child, and children receiving the best that their parents can offer and getting great starts to life and all the rest.

What I am opposed to is the use of this ‘phrase’ (inrelenting belief of the ignorant?) by simple people who see the world in black and white, who jump to conclusions about what parents do and automatically condemn. Particularly if (when) the behaviour of the said parents can be (mis)construed as going against their own beliefs.

It is a phrase that can cause a lot of confusion and unfouded accusations and judgement, lead to distress and angst, and sometimes depression, in mothers (and fathers). It creates conflict. The main problem with it is that it can be interpreted in so many ways, yet it always comes back to being about whatever the mother does to and for the child. Or doesn’t do.

I’ve been the recipient of many an accusatory email, Facebook thread and forum thread in my time, because I strongly believe that, at times, Mum needs to come first.

Not at the expense of the child and his or her emotional, psychological, spiritual and/or physical well-being, but rather for the benefit of it. It’s all very well to sit back and judge mums who leave their kids at home unsupervised, or feed them baked beans on toast for dinner (which is a hell of a lot better than fast food that many “good” mothers feed their kids, then justify it!), or leave the kids in the “evils” of childcare, or … blah blah blah.

To be fair, I’m not an advocate of leaving kids at home, unsupervised. However, put this in the context of a severely depressed woman who is this close to homicide and/or suicide and I tend to lean on the “get mum a break and put HER first” side of the fence. I’ll also do this for someone who is not severely depressed, or even depressed at all, but having a serioulsy bad moment and likely to hurt someone.

This “the child should always come first” is actually coming first, because Mum put herself first by getting out of the house and going for a walk. She does that or smacks the kid, and we all know where that leads to … yup, more condemnation, accusations and judgement. And looky that – no support! She’d damned if she does and damned if she doesn’t.

Mums heading off to work or study, leaving their kids in care and doing all those horrible sorts of things, we’ve read, time and again, how it’s selfish and they “should” be with their kids. As someone who went off to study with a 3 month old baby – I can tell you that I copped all the flak, but rose above it because I knew that it was the best for him, as well as me. The need to study, or go to work is not always financial; it may be social, emotional, psychological … it’s a drive some women have that can be, quite literally, a life saver, and have profound impacts on their well-being. ALL of their wellbeing.

I can honestly say that mums putting themselves and their needs first is more often than not, the best for the child. It is putting the child first and foremost in their mind, and doing what they can to ensure the safety and wellbeing of thier kids, by not putting the child first at every moment of the day.

Many of us have heard the analogy (which I’m loathe to quote here because I’m so sick of hearing it, but some haven’t so here it is) of putting your oxygen mask on before you help others put their’s on. If you’re unconscious because you put “the child first”, there’s bugger all you can do to help them, or anyone else.

If feeding yourself before feeding the child means you have the means to earn (beg? borrow? whatever you need to do?) some cash so you can purchase more food, then you’re better off doing that than feeding the baby and collapsing on the floor, incapable of doing anything.

If your baby is not sleeping and won’t stop crying, you’re better off walking out of the room and leaving it to cry, than smacking it, throwing it, or landing yourself in a mental institution. You’re no good to anyone there, and you won’t be able to settle your baby to sleep when you’re in a psych ward.

If you need to leave your toddler in care, or your school child needs afters school care several times a week, so you can go off to work, or study, or run your business, then they’re better off there than at home with a woman who screams and yells, who cries and drinks excessively and who flinches at the sight of her children coming near her.

So no, it’s imperative that that the child not ALWAYS come first.

And it’s that child not always coming first that goes a long way to ensuring that their wellbeing is, in fact, top priority.

Dec
18

Enough with the Santa Bashing!

Posted by: madcow | Comments (3)

It’s been going on for far too long now.

I do remember it started pre-kids (for me, obviously), but I really got into it when I did have kids.

For many years it’s all been about how “Santa” may offend those who don’t celebrate Christmas, for religous (mostly) or other reasons. Apparently, its shoving Christianity down the throats of others … because, actually, now you mention it, I do recall Santa popping up in lots of pages throughout the bible … and forcing them to partake in ‘our’ celebrations!

Kinder committee meetings, loaded with white, middle class, self-righteous and “doing what is right for everyone” Mums, almost come to fisticuffs over whether Santa would appear at the end of year kinda breakup party (and whose ogranic, fat free chocolate crackles would feature this year) and would his appearance offend poor little 4 year old Abdul or Noah.

No consideration is ever given for whether this would offend me or my beliefs, values and traditions.

Quite frankly, I do find it highly offensive that what has been part of my culture for as long as I can remember, and apparently long before that, is being ditched on the grounds that it might offend “New Australians” and their cultures and beliefs, by well-meaning but don’t-actually-have-a-clue-about-who-might-be-offended-because-they-assume-not-ask do gooders.

(If someone walked past me in the street and said “Happy Ramadan” or “Happy Hanukkah”, I wouldn’t take offence. I would accept it as their tradition and reply in what I hope would be the appropriate manner. And with a big smile on my face)

Anyhoo. that argument has now apparently run it’s course and it’s no longer up for discussion. Santa is no longer an outcase because he represents a Christian tradition.

Nope.

Now he is too fat! Oh, and he smokes and encourages reckless behaviours, like speeding and roof hopping and taking reindeer for midnight flights. He “breaks into houses” and sits children on his knee.

He needs a makeover and a new Prius to deliver all those presents to all those children. Oh, and rather than “break into houses” he should probably use a service like Australia Post to deliver his goods. Because they’re sooo reliable and get things there on time and … oh wait, on strike and not delivering anything!

No mention of his suit, which is highly innappropriate for the climes in the Southern Hemisphere and he’ll probably dehydrate. Not setting a good example at all.

Let’s totally overlook the fact that he’s jolly! Something that, I don’t know about you, makes me smile! Not a lot of that going about at the moment. He also does it without profanity, which not many can say about things like comedians, or myself.

Sure he may “break into house” except that he doesn’t generally “break” anything, doesn’t leave a mess, doesn’t take your good jewellery and leave you with a sick feeling in the pit of your stomach and prolonged sense of dread and fear. Rather, he leaves nice things, and things that keep your kids otherwise occupied for about 13 minutes.

Also, I think that we should definitely promote binge drinking, philandering (and sometimes rapist) sports stars as our role models, and not a very nice man, who speaks politely to our children and actively listens to them!

Yeah, you wouldn’t want someone being nice to your kids and making them feel special and listening to them, would you now? They might, oh, I don’t know, feel good about themselves for a moment or two. We can’t have that now, can we?

And do I need to add “he’s not real, people”?

Back off Santa! He’s a very nice man, who makes me and my kids smile, he had great manners and he’s cuddly.

I’m getting really sick of the Santa bashing. Not only does he not deserve it, but, quite frankly, I’m getting really pissed off about being told what to do all the time, and having my cultural beliefs and traditions being bagged all the time. It’s offensive!

Back off Santa, and let him do his job.

(Oooh, I hope that gets me on his “Nice” list :D )

Categories : Reality Parenting
Comments (3)
Nov
20

Book Review: Mama Mia

Posted by: madcow | Comments (3)

A memoir of mistakes, magazines and motherhood … an quite a nice little read, too.

Mama Mia - a memoir of mistakes, magzines & motherhoodThere’s not much we like more than a secret – or not so secret – delve into the world of someone who isn’t us.

Particularly when that someone is honest about her experiences, and gives us a taste of the goings on behind the scenes in the magazine industry. What goes on behind that which goes on behind the fashion and celebrity world! Exciting.

Mama Mia; a memoir of mistakes, magazines and motherhood by writer and magazine editor, Mia Freedman gives us all of this and more. Mia shares her motherhood experiences with candour, and an honesty that many will find refreshing and thankful for.

Ardent home birthers and advocates for mums to stay at home may struggle a little with her truthfulness, however Mia does take responsibility for her thoughts, feelings and experiences. She owns them, in such a way that doesn’t project onto, or judge others for their thoughts, feelings and beliefs.

(Except, perhaps for her Smug List and Crap Lists. Possibly because some of the stuff on her Crap List, I do too, and don’t see myself as being a Crap Mum … I like to call it “reality” (or “reality parenting” if you prefer) as opposed to “crap” or “bad”. But, hey, that’s just me :) )

Her journey through the world of magazines Cleo and Cosmo are, without a doubt, eye opening, intriguing and, at times, a little bit scary as to what really goes on! I, personally, am in admiration of her stand for body image and all the issues that go along with it – and again, more eye openers there.

The sometimes clash / sometimes mesh of motherhood and career, complete, of course, with mistakes, provide some lighthearted relief, a fair amount of “oh, thank goodness it’s not just me’s” and couple of laugh out loud and tearful moments.

Mia has clearly written from the heart. Overall, an easy read, relateable to many mothers and a fascinating delve into the (not so glamorous) magazine world.

Mama Mia; a memoir of mistakes, magazines and motherhood is available from Seek Books.

(A worthwhile request as a Christmas pressie, too ;) )

If this review is on your product, and you’d like to let everyone know what a Real Mum thinks of it, please feel free to use the button below to promote the review on your site/product.
rmrev-blue

 

If you’d like a different button, please check out our range here.)

Categories : Real Mums Review
Comments (3)

OK. I get it. I admit it. In fact. I’ve never denied it.

I do understand those concerns some of you have, and thanks for your emails, too, by the way.

I hear ya. I’m a bad mother. I swear in front of my kids. Hell, I even swear at them at times. I laugh when they’re rude to me. And I blog about it. I ask them if they would like a smack. I feed them cereal for dinner. I live by the philosophy that if they can open the Tupperware they can eat it.

And, quite frankly, if they don’t, then they don’t eat most of the time.

I openly admit that Thomas the Tank Engine bores the tits off me, craft sends me into a coma and I’d rather work till midnight than join in Family Movie Night when they choose Star Wars as the movie of the moment.

I let them watch the Simpsons and don’t care what anyone thinks.

I send them to school with vegemite sandwiches and carrot sticks, and not any of the suggestions on the millions of mummy websites that call for sushi rolls and hommus dips.

I do things like this, take photos and distrubute them to my contacts lists …
Bargain!
I could go on, and on and on about my failings as a mother.

But if you read between the lines, particularly those lines in my personal blog, Diary of a Mad Cow, you’ll notice that …

… actualy, you know what. If I have to explain to you what you may notice should you decide to cast aside your judgements, then there’s little point.

Those of you who can see the confident, self-assured kids, the connected and FUN household and the security it offers – and you know who you are – thank you! I love that you can see beyond the written words, and don’t just take them at face value.

Those of you who still prefer to judge me, then that’s ok. You are quite within your rights to do so. I still don’t need to justify myself to you.

But for the sake of other Mums (current and to be) perhaps before any of us leap to a conclusion, and choose to judge, maybe we need to be aware of their story to help us to understand them.

Here is the story of a Bad Mother. I invite you to read it. I only hope it enlightens you and helps you to become more accepting, just as it did for me.

Categories : Reality Parenting
Comments (9)
Oct
15

Tell us how to do, not what NOT to do

Posted by: madcow | Comments (1)

A story across the papers this morning is the story of a Mum accused of assault after disciplining her child with a wooden spoon.

Now, I know this is a contentious issue, thwart with the widely varying opinions of many, many people. I don’t particularly want to get into debate about whether or not smacking with a wooden spoon is ok/justifyable/acceptable or not.

A couple of things I’d like to draw attention to, though.

One of my pet peeves of the last decade is the increasing awareness children have of how their parents discipline them, and acceptable actions and behaviours of parents. And unacceptable for that matter. I’m not against them being made aware that physical violence is unnacceptable, and I’m pleased it is.

(My own experience of going to school after being physically abused and being refused access to the counsellor because I didn’t have a note from my parents. despite being covered in bruises makes me acutely aware of the need for this)

What I’m peeved about is that children, whilst being made aware of their rights, are not being made aware of the responsibilities that go along with these rights. It is their right not to be smacked, yet it is also their responsibilty to behave in a manner that is socially acceptable and not harmful to others, whether physically, emotionally or mentally. They know it is not ok for people to harm them, yet shoplifting, being rude, misbehaving and causing disruption are, seemingly, not within their headspace.

Inside of this is the abuse some children make of this system. A friend of mine was recently called to the school for “bashing” and “punching” her child. None of which she did. Her child seemed totally oblivious to the consequences of her behaviours, the waste of time and resources and the stress and angst she placed not only on her mother and the rest of her family, but her teachers and head of the school.

Knowing your rights is one thing. Earning them, and not abusing them are another.

Aaaaane we have the commentators … Joe Tucci of the Australian Childhood Foundation who states “Children should never have to be hurt to be taught a lesson. It is not affective in shaping children’s behaviour.” and Dr Michael Carr-Greg who puts in his two cents worth (ok, he was asked to put it in!) “there were better ways to discipline a child”.

Not doubting you Joe and Michael, yet here we are again, with loads of parents still doing it, and the results of the Herald-Sun survey show an overwhelming majority of people think it’s ok.

Again, here we are … more “don’t do this, don’t do that”, and even the “there are better ways, you know”. Great, what the hell are these better ways?

(That was rhetorical – personally I know there are other ways, what they are and how to utlise them – I’m talking about the significant proportion of people who don’t have access to the resources that tell them what the better ways are.)

And again lots of “do’s and don’ts” yet no bloody support. Currently, in this last hour, I’ve been in conversations with friends who are at breaking point, due to kids with special needs, who are being told by professionals to “just do” stuff, yet are getting no help! I really understand that the suggsetions make sense. But when you’ve had next to no sleep and can’t decide which foot is on your left, being consistent and calm and collected and not getting just a wee bit exasperated is really bloody hard!

Rather than continually telling us what not to do, how about implementing some ways that are actually doable in the real world  and not some theoretical “I’m at the office all day telling parents how to raise their kids, so don’t really have much hands on experience and/or can’t remember what it was like when I was at home” don’t do this.

I’m as much against smacking as a lot of others, but I’d LOVE to see more support for parents, more practical ideas, less “don’t”, more “do’s” and a LOT more “here’s how to cope when you have had 1.3 hours sleep, the toddler has drawn on the walls, the baby won’t stop crying and the school kid has autism”.

When you’ve done that, then feel free to tell us how crap we are.

As for a nine year old who gets the occasional smack across the bum … nine year olds are pretty clever. If she doesn’t get it when mum tells her three times and gives her three warnings, you really have to wonder …

Categories : Reality Parenting
Comments (1)
Sep
23

My 8 year old for Prime Minister

Posted by: madcow | Comments (0)

We all have high aspirations for our children and/or want them to be the best and do the best they can.

My 8 year old has decided he’s going to be Prime Minister. I’m not sure how I feel so far as “high aspirations” go, and whether he will succeed, given he is kind, compassionate and smart.

He’s had this idea since he was about 6. It followed his desire to be a chef, specifically Gordon Ramsay, then a food critic.

He’s certainly got the negotiating skills, and the ability to talk his way out of stuff. He can get his own way with the well placed use of words, and leave you lost for words in any sort of argument. And he has a great sense of humour. He’s well on his way already.

Despite a small, potential threat to actually becoming leader of our country, where he suggested he would bring back the death penalty, but only for “people who bring drugs into the country, people who let their dogs poo and don’t pick it up after then, and Lady Gaga because I hate her song and she can’t sing”, I think he’s still got a good chance.

Because he’s a damned site more switched on than our current PM, and, in this instance, Victoria’s premier.

Which I discovered when Godzilla (the 6 year old) asked me “why men get drunk because it is so stupid” and Monkey Boy followed it up after witnessing Fevola’s antics at the Brownlow last night.

He pretty much said what lots have been saying, about closing bars earlier, and perhaps not letting people get drunk.

He then said some really profound things. I remind you, he is 8 (and three quarters, sorry!) and he came out with all this himself …

  • there’s a lot of violence on the streets when people drink too much and the bars don’t close till really early in the morning (yup, nothing new there, it’s in the papers daily)
  • but people don’t get home till really early in the morning, and then they can’t do their jobs properly
  • and their boss won’t be happy with them and will sack them
  • and they’re rude to people and the businesses will have to close because no one will go to those shops any more
  • and they’ll crash their cars because they’re drunk. Or very tired
  • and they will be really grumpy and rude to their kids and their wives
  • imagine if they are school teachers? They will be rude to the kids in their class, and the kids won’t learn anything or be happy at school
  • or if they drove trams or trains, they would crash and people would die (he can be a bit dramatic)

He said more.

I want to know how it is an eight year old can see the impact that this drunkeness and keeping nightclubs open till 7am is having not just on the bashing victims, but on the broader community, and it seems no one else can? Especially not our premier, whatshisname?

How can a child see that the drunkeness (or even tiredness) of one person can impact on bosses, families, customers, and many others? Not only that, but he can see what sorts of impacts; poor productivity, grumpiness, inability to focus or function … etc.

I say we put an eight year old in that position now. If nothing else, they will be able to show the broader community the effects of this behaviour on the broader community .. then maybe the broader community, and the individuals themselves, will see that it’s not just about the individual they’ve gang bashed … it’s a much bigger, wider, diverse issue than that and those families.

I’m all for my eight year old being in some sort of persuasive and powerful position now. Because he’s a lot more insightful and smarter than those we have in power now.

And he swears less. Ok, some days he swears less.

Besides, I think there’s also talk of longer jail sentences, and quite possibly the death penalty, for people who bash other people in these circumstances. I’m sure the families of these victims would be behind my son as well.

(Oh, and Lady Gaga’s Paparazzi has grown on him, and there’s been much less talk of death penalties for “Crap singers” (his words), so Australian Idol is safe. For the time being, at least…)

Categories : Reality Parenting
Comments (0)

I preface this post by reminding that I am a breastfeeding Mum. I am aware of the benefits of breastfeeding. I am an advocate for breastfeeding in public, and will defend a woman’s right to breastfeed. This is not justification. This is to prevent the flurry of incorrect emails & comments regarding my non-breastfeeding ways. Is there anybody else out there that sees the problem with this? Anyone that can see the … silliness, nay, stupidity in this? Are they serious?

Now, let me be clear, I am all for mums returning to work. I’m an advocate for workplaces being family friendly. I’m not suggesting that workplaces don’t take steps to cater for breastfeeding mums.

But … seriously? Come on. There’s yet another outrage on the web about a woman who was asked to express in a car, and forced to make up for work time spent expressing.

Horror. Outrage. Disgust! This is apalling, an abhorrent way to treat a breastfeeding woman. Because she is breastfeeding!

Here’s an example of such a story.

 Is it just me, or can anyone else see the ridiculousness of this? From where I sit, employers pay people to work. If they’re not working, why shouldn’t they have to make up the time? Employers employ people so they can keep their businesses going, provide a service for their customers and/or the community and keep the economy going. If employees don’t perform their duties, the business goes belly up and, surprise, the employee is out of a job.

 Being a breastfeeding mum is not going to stop you being out of a job when there is no business for you to work in.

That’s not discrimination, that’s doing the job you are paid to do!

And, yes, as an employer I’d be pretty annoyed to. Not because of the breastfeeding / expressing, but because I was paying you to do something you’re not! I feel the same about smokers and people who use their mobiile phone on my hours.

 To be perfectly honest, the employer, whether a private or public business, has other things on their mind than the private lives of their employees. The lives of their employees outside of the workplace are generally not at the forefront of their minds. Or on their minds at all that matter. And for some businesses, creating an environment suitable for breastfeeding and/or expressing is an expense they can ill afford.

Purchase ergonomic chairs to comply with worksafe and so they don’t get sued, or throw someone out of an office and renovate it so they don’t get done for imaginary discrimination? It’s a financial, and time cost, that is not necessarily a priority.

And, imagine this:

Your bus driver stops the bus, mid route, and asks everyone to hop off so she can breastfeed in private.

“Yeah, really sorry I had to pop out during your husband’s open heart surgery. It is a shame he died, but, you know, the baby needed a feed.”

“If you could just stand there with your hands up for another 20 minutes, I just need to express, then I’ll go about either arresting you or shooting you. Thanks, I’d appreciate it.”

Oh, and they’d have to comply because you are a breastfeeding mother. If they don’t you could whinge and complain really loudly, and probably sue for discrimination.

And no, I’m not being stupid. That’s exactly what these stories are implying you’re asking for. Where do we draw the line?

As a breastfeeding employee, I respected the conditions under which I was employed. I worked around my feeds. The breastfeeding was my issue, not my employers, although they were generous and supportive. I wasn’t prepared to sabotage their business for my own needs.

Sadly, I believe if this ridiculousness continues, it’s going to get worse for breastfeeding mums. It won’t be long before they will be spoken about like we do about smokers .. with contempt, about how they’re allowed to take extra long tea breaks and don’t care about the impact they’re having on the business and rest of the staff. Other employees will resent them, bitch about them, and make their life hard.

The difference between smokers and breastfeeding mums is that smokers aren’t as emotionally vulnerable, and don’t take the abuse as personally as breastfeeding mums.

It’s my personal opinion that the breastfeeding organisations and supporters who are behind this are doing some serious damage to their cause, and potentially creating a situation where breastfeeding mums are unemployable.

Or would be if people could get away with not employing them. Also, they’re scaring people off breastfeeding. Why would they continue if this is what they beleive (thanks to the very loud rhetoric) happens to breastfeeding mums in the workplace?

And while smokers (a habit I abhor, and if I had my way, I wouldn’t employ them, either) may take extra long breaks, at least they don’t cause this kind of trouble for their employers.

(Yes, I’m aware of the health implications of smoking and the health benefits of breastfeeding – so if I can’t compare the two of them here, nor can anyone else when complaining about how smokers can take longer breaks and breastfeeders are (allegedly) discrimiated against).

Categories : Reality Parenting
Comments (14)

I can’t believe how amazingly creative and talented I am. I can and do do things that I never, ever thought imaginable. And things I never, even thought I’d be interested in doing.

Pre-kids, and when I was first a Mum, I heard all the hilarious things that Mums do – you know, chef, maid, chauffeur, psychologist, terrorist negotiator … the rest.

Then there’s the things they don’t tell you – poologist, wearer of WeetBix, creative food stylist …

I never imagined I would become a songwriter, though. How exciting.

I don’t know a Mum who doesn’t walk around singing songs they’ve made up to their babies. Songs that make baby laugh, because, well, they’re babies and don’t understand, otherwise they’d tell you to shut up. Most of my songs contain the word “doodle”, because I have boys.

But I went all Wiggles the other night, and penned (not literally) an educational song, designed to encourage my six year old to eat his vegetables. It was a very good one. Feel free to use it yourself.

It goes like this;

Vegetables, vegetables,
Vegetables are YUM!

Vegetables, vegetables,
Help poo come our your BUM!

It’s good, because it has the words “poo” and “bum” in it.

What awesome things have you done?

Categories : Reality Parenting
Comments (4)

You may or may not recall, but I recently conducted a survey on Breast and Bottle feeding in public places. Thanks to the fabulous 446 women who responded – very much appreciated!

The aim of the survey, really, was to get some awesome comebacks for when people commented to mums who were feeding their babies in public, either with their boobs, or with a bottle.

Sadly, aside from the suggestion of “If you are offended bymy breastfeeding, please feel free to put a blanket over your own head”, which has been around for aaaages and “Fuck Off” as suggested by a number of respondants to the survey, we didn’t get what we wanted out of the survey.

The survey pretty much consisted of 5 questions:

1. If you feed/ever fed your baby in public did you breast feed (91.3%) or bottle feed (34.8%) – the crossover of numbers reflects those that did both breast and bottle feeding in public.

2. Did you ever feel uncomfortable feeding your baby in public? Yes or No – Please explain the Yes.

3. Did you ever receive any comments, postive or negative, from the general public whilst feeding?

4. If “Yes” to the previous question, how did (or didn’t) you respond? and

5. What do you wish you had said? What would you like to have said or would say if in the same situation again? Don’t hold back! … what would you really like to have said? (this last one being the whole point of the excercise).

Whilst we weren’t then able to come up with a list of 10 Great Responses To People Who Comment on You Feeding Your Baby In Public, the research resulted in some great, and not so great, observations.

We discovered breastfeeding mums are paranoid and/or sanctimonious, and bottle feeding women are self-denigrating – BIG TIME!

Interestingly, despite nowhere in the survey asking for it, a number of responses from those who breastfed referred to the “poison” of forumla and a number of quite dispariging remarks regarding formula, bottle feeding and/or bottle feeders.

On the plus side of this, this number wasn’t huge (6% of respondees) but enough to note it’s presence.

A slightly greater number (just over 9%) of bottle feeding mums answerd “No” to the uncomfortable feeding in public because they “couldn’t breastfeed, so I didn’t breastfeed them in public”. Um, that wasn’t the criteria - we asked about feeding in public and specified breast OR bottle. When I lasted check, giving a baby a bottle of formula was still feeding them, right? Or did I miss something somewhere. The sad thing was the way they spoke about themselves in relation to their inability to breastfeed. Made us cry.

As for being uncomfortable feeding in public, a majority said the didn’t feel uncomfortable (56.5%) and 43.5% did. The most common response for feeling uncomfortable was a wriggly baby who pulled off and they didn’t want everyone to see their boobs. Second most common, and nowhere near as many, said they did feel uncomfortable when first attempting breastfeeding in public, but once they got the hang of it, they were mostly ok. And Fathers-in-law were a big culprit, with a few stating they didn’t like breastfeeding in front of theirs.

A few bottle feeders also felt awkward, ashamed or as though they were/would be judged.

As far as comments went, 41.3% said that no one had commented to them at all when feeding, and 58.7% had had someone comment. An overwhelming 61% of these comments were positive. Of the remaining 39% although respondants had ticked yes, almost half of those weren’t actually comments, just people “looking at me”. Some where quite obvious glares, and one a weird lady. The remainder were not necessarily distaste, and could have just been “glancing in my direction”.

Again, interestingly, considering the amount of media related to bresatfeeding mums being discriminated against, of the remaining “negative comments” only 2% were directed to breastfeeding mums, and of those, most were teenage boys sniggering. And one husband who vehemently objected, using the word “tart”. Hrm. The rest of the negative comments were directed at bottle feeding mums, particularly pertaining to “breast is best”, one mum being told she could not use the parents room as they were for breastfeeding mums only, and several being verbally attacked.

So, while some breastfeeding mums were seriously sanctimonious, and some bottle feeding mums were seriously self-denigrating, the number was few, which is nice.

And breastfeeding mums did appear to be just a wee bit (ok, a lot) paranoid when it came to feeding in public, most more worried about what people might think or be thinking, not what was actually happening. Would be lovely to see them not so paranoid and just do it.

Particularly when most (98%) of the negative comments were directed at bottle feeding mums! I can understand why they may be self-denigrating (but please get over it, it’s not good for anyone!)

The bit we liked most, however, was not so much the fact that almost half the respondants hadn’t had anyone comment, but that of those that did have someone comment, they were positive comments. And some very lovely ones in there, too. It warmed our hearts to know that a majority of people said nice things to mums feeding their babies, and mostly breastfeeding mums. Makes a lovely change from everything else we’re hearing about the way breastfeeding mums are treated and spoken to.

Once again, sorry we can’t yet produce a list of Awesome Comebacks, and we thank everyone for taking the time to complete our survey, share your stories and be honest about your experiences. It was greatly appreciated.

Categories : Reality Parenting
Comments (7)